Welcome to the community here Dhan. I see this is your first post so I want to do three things with my reply: respond to your exact question, make a comment about one of the poses you mention, and do both of those in a way that brings integrity and clarity to the topic.
In short, two months of practice, assuming you are not doing asana 8 hours a day for 60 days (and even then), would not equal balance, physiologically speaking. One’s progress in yoga (and I use the term progress loosely) takes time, effort, and patience. Let’s just call it delayed gratification.
When I teach balancing (by the very phrase the skill of balance is taught and therefore also learned and learning has its own rhythm) I teach three basic elements. The first is the physiological element. This is the alignment and the action in the physical body in this pose or that pose. The second is breath. The breath has to move in a way that supports the student. Most beginners cannot breathe at all let alone breathe in a way that empowers their practice. And the third is focus. Some students are very focused the first day. Others are not focused in the third year. But these three things come together, they unite, or “yoke” if you will to bring balance.
You mention Virabhadrasana III. Presuming you are accurate I find this pose to be inappropriate for a student with only two months of practice. Yes you “may” do it. Yes you may be “able” to do it. Yes it may be pleasing or entertaining or engaging…but it is not a pose for beginners who have not mastered certain actions in standing poses. Even if I were completely off base - which does happen - I would question such a pose for those students suffering from plantar fasciitis.