The Clash of Civilisations: Indian vs Western

As promised here is a demonstration of the superior quality of Indian cultural forms vs Western form.

As was discussed earlier we can identify how developed a culture is by the depth, complexity, texture and refinement of their cultural forms. Also the greater their capacity for introversion is a mark of a highly developed culture.

[B][U]Indian classical music vs Western classical music[/U][/B]

First what is the dharma of music? Music is the most beautiful of the arts, because it mirrors what this universe really is at the fundamental level: vibrations of matter. Thus, music should invoke certain vibrations within us and create moods naturally. Thus ones musical forms have to have the expressive ability to do this. Ultimately, music should be able to create spiritual vibrations with us. In this sense music is more than art - it is a science of communing with the universe.

In the “What is enlightenment thread” I posted one short comparison between Indian music and Western, but it failed to show why Indian music was superior. I have done some more research and found some articles and comments by more learned people on Indian and Western music.

Subject and theme

[B]Western:[/B]

The majority of Western classical music is loud, fast and dramatic. It is usually polyphonic involving an assortment of instruments playing their own melody skillfully orchestrated to often produce a story. Its main function is to entertain and dazzle. They also have a dramatic storytelling effect with different instruments coming in appointed times. It a highly controlled and fixed form, reflecting the mechanistic worldview of its origins.
Here are some examples:

Mozart, Requiem: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zi8vJ_lMxQI
Beethoven, Symphony no 5: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LKbkpokQ-hE&feature=related

[B]Indian:[/B]

The majority of Indian music is quiet, slow and meditative, often involving few instruments. It is usually monophonic with a solo instrument, and supporting instruments playing the same melody together and complimenting one another. Its main function is to bring one into a meditation or generally into deep contemplative state or deep immersion in a mood. There is no drama or storytelling through music. It is highly improvisational, often composed on the spot to express the mood of the occasion, reflecting the spiritual worldview of it origins.

Here are some good example:


[B]Compare:[/B] There is more purity in the Indian pieces, pure melody and a sacredness about it. If one listens to it induces a meditative state. The Western pieces are full of drama, noise even yelling and torment - the very opposite of meditation. I tried to test the reaction of my mother to the music as she was hearing it for the first time, and she was not very impressed. She said it sounded scary, noisy and tormenting. This is not to undermine Mozart and Beethoven, because their skill in creating drama is commendable - but the Indian pieces achieive a higher purpose of putting one into a deeper state of consciousness.

[B][U]Range, scale and expressiveness[/U][/B]

[B]Western:[/B]

The Western scale is an octive consists of 7 main notes and 12 semitones on an equally tempered scale. This means that the distance between each note is equal. Here is a Western scale:

Key # Key color Frequency (Hz) Name

1 White 240 C
2 Black 254 C # (D b)
3 White 269 D
4 Black 285 D # (E b)
5 White 302 E
6 White 320 F
7 Black 338.5 F (G b)
8 White 358.5 G
9 Black 380 G # (A b)
10 White 402 A
11 Black 426 A # (B b)
12 White 451 B

[B]Indian:[/B]

The India scale is an octive which consists of 7 main notes and 22 microtones on a just tempered scale, meaning the distance between each note is not the same ratio. They are selected simply because they sound good. Here is an Indian scale

Sruti Frequency Frequency ratio (Hertz)
Sa 1 240
Ri 1 32/31 252.8
Ri 2 16/15 256
Ri 3 10/9 266.6
Ri 4 9/8 270
Ga 1 32/27 284.4
Ga 2 6/5 288
Ga 3 5/4 300
Ga 4 81/64 303.7
Ma 1 4/3 320
Ma 2 27/20 324
Ma 3 45/32 337.5
Ma 4 64/45 341.3
Pa 3/2 360
Dha 1 128/81 379
Dha 2 8/5 384
Dha 3 5/3 400
Dha 4 27/16 405
Ni 1 16/9 426.6
Ni 2 9/5 432
Ni 3 15/8 450
Ni 4 31/16 465

As Indian music is improvisional there is no demand that one must stick even to the 22 microtone, theoretically one can glide up and down the scale between infinite frequencies, even nanotones if one was that good!. An Indian musical artist shows their talent by how deeply they can penetrate into the note, to the most subtle of vibrations. This reflects the Indian worldview of how reality is a continuum going from gross to most subtle.
.
[B]Compare:[/B] There is without any doubt more expression and range in the Indian scale giving a more smoothe transistion between notes and allowing for amazing dexterity and skill that is exclusive to only Indian music. My ex-girlfriend who was a singer and did musical theatre once listened to an Indian piece and mistook the Indian vocal gymnatics to be “vibrato” she was shocked when she realised it was all controlled and precise and exclaimed that such skill is unheard of in Western music. Indian music, even children can do it.

Here is an excerpt from an article explaining the difference:

Why, some Indian schools of thought even propose that there are infinite frequencies in an octave. The basic reason for such demands for more than twelve ‘srutis’ per octave is that Indian music, (not just Karnatic music) seems to ‘flow’ through the frequencies, whereas a Western song seems ‘jumpy’. Take for example, ‘Baa baa black sheep’ and compare it to an Indian song, say, a movie song like ‘Roop tera mastaana’. The Indian song seems to involve a lot of vocal acrobatics and nuances and not just go through piano-like jumps. This is the main difference between the Indian and Western music and we will return to this point again and again in this primer.
This is the reason why Indian classical music cannot be played effectively in a twelve key per octave instrument like a piano. Of course, several Western instruments have been ‘adapted’ with a little modification here and there, to play Indian classical music - violin, mandolin and guitar, for example. Some other instruments have been simply ‘used’, without modification, such as the harmonium and its latest cousin, the keyboard. Indian purists abhor such blatant use of Western, ‘equally tempered’ instruments. Expert harmonium player, Rajan Parrikar, points out that ‘Just tempered’ harmoniums, harmoniums with 22 tones per octave, even over 50 tones per octave etc have been built by various people.

Now let us come back to this basic difference between the Western and the Indian classical music system. We noted that in Indian music it is not enough to produce just twelve or even twenty two ‘tones’ in an octave. One ought to produce even the intermediate frequencies. These intermediate frequencies, which do not have any keys to produce them, are called ‘microtones’. The Indian word for the ‘microtone’ is ‘gamakam’. (of course, ‘gamak’ in hindi) It is often very difficult to explain this concept clearly and precisely. If the C key produces 240 Hz and the C# key produces 254 Hz what intermediate frequencies are we talking about ? Does Indian music use sounds produced at 247 Hz ? Treatises have been written in India about such microtonal apects of music. Suffice it to say that microtones or gamakams tend to be clustered around the primary key frequency, although this need not always be the case.

Note that if you postulate that an Indian music octave has twenty two or two hundred keys or infinity per octave, then what used to be a ‘microtone’ in a twelve-key system could now very well be a key. Of course, you can make a piano with such large number of tones per octave. It may be a long piano and you will need a superhuman dexterity to play it. But the positive side of it is that you will be able to play Indian music on it. The bottomline is, the piano produces just twelve frequencies in one octave and that is enough to compose a lot of Western songs. Whereas, to make Indian music, twelve keys are not enough in an octave.

Let us talk some more about microtones or gamakams. The vocal gliding and rolling in Indian music, (Remember Kishore Kumar’s yodelling ?) whether it sounds good or not, are again examples of microtone usage. In fact, the microtones add variety to the Indian classical music - an extra dimension. From movie songs to folk music to classical music, the very heart of Indian music is this ‘continuous flow’ or ‘gliding through a continuum of frequencies’ or gamakam or microtonal excursions. Thus it is often said that Indian music is ‘melody-based’. Since microtones are so important in Karnatic and Hindustani music and very few instruments can produce all the frequencies in an octave, the best enunciation of Indian classical music is in vocal singing. Many instruments like the violin, Gottuvadhyam (called Chitra Veena these days) and even the simple bamboo flute can produce a lot of gamakams, of course.

http://openscroll.org/ramesh/gentle1.html

This Western music is highly limited in its range and expression and does not glide as smoothly as Indian music. Some of the acrobatics done in Indian singing would be impossible do in Western music:

Here are some good examples(Please watch each clip for at least 3 min to get a better appreciation)

Carntic, south Indian:



Hindustani, North Indian:

A famous old Hindi film song, by one of my fav singers:

Compare this to what is considered good singing in Western music:


There is no control in the voice, just vibrato and modulation and screaming high notes. It looks quite pitiful in comparison.

[B][U]Harmony[/U][/B]

[B]Western:[/B]

Western music is dominated by the concept of “harmony” that is to have several instruments playing their own melodies and doing their own thing at once i.e., orchestra, but in skillful coordination and construction - or by having chords(pressing more than 1 key at the same time)

[B]Indian[/B]:

In Indian music “harmony” is more or less absent, although other instruments to play, they compliment the main melody and remain in tune with it throughout. It is considered jarring in Indian music for an instrument to play a different tune.

Comparison: "Harmony " in Western music is a misnomer, because there is nothing harmonious about having a cacophony of sounds and several instruments playing different tunes at the same time. In fact the real harmony is in the Indian music, where every instrument compliments the main instrument and melody and work together to create the same mood.

I would not use the words harmony is completely unknown, because the Taanpura does provide some harmony. There are several tanpura tunings each of which produces certain overtones which are used to align notes with. Also the swarmandal is used to provide a backdrop (with the taanpura).

The whole North Indian system of 22 notes per scale called shrutis are found by using a cycle of fifths, fourths, and third (ie DO, MI, FA, and SO in solfa). One reason why Indian classical (epecially the north Indian style), does not use what Western musicians call harmony, is because when these cords are heard very critically, they are not ideally harmonious, and therefore don’t actually qualify as harmony from a perfectionist point of view. To understand this, make the following experiment. Take a user scale tunable synthesizer and reduce E by 14 cents and raise G by 2 cents, then play the C Major triad. Remove all vibrato and modulation so that the notes are almost pure sine wave and select a continuous note instrument like the flute or organ (but absolutely no vibrato). Now keep playing this C Major chord continuously for a prolonged period. Notice how peaceful and smooth it sounds. This is the harmony of the Taanpura when perfectly tune to DO and SO (MI emanates as an overtone). Now abrubtly switch back to C Major on the Western Equal tempered scale. If your ears are sensitive enough, you will find the tempered scale distinctly jarring. Perhaps, this excercise should not be recommended to Western Musicians, since being highly pitch sensitive, they will at once here the imperfections and may never again be completely happy with Western Chords once they experience the bliss of the perfect C Major triad. Indian classical music uses prolonged notes during the ALAAP (meditative Phase). This is the time when even a few cycles per second off the correct frequency will produce a beating sound which is considered unmusical from the Indian classical perspective. Western music doesn’t excessively prolong notes (at least not to the extent that Indian classical does) so that the Equal Tempered scales with the imperfections are not as noticeable.

So, we do use harmony in Indian classical, but it’s only the perfect harmony of a few chords that can only be played in a single scale. This is also why we don’t change scales. All our music is in one scale, yet we acheive an almost infinite variety of by using 2000+ raagas. Furthermore, we have glides meend across one of more notes and gammak (fast portmento) to express emotions, which is almost missing in Western music where all the notes sound too plain.

http://nirvana73.blogspot.com/2008/03/indian-classical-music-vs-western.html

[B][U]Melody:[/U][/B]

[B]Western:[/B]

Melody in Western classical music is lesser important than harmony and chords and many Western pieces sound similar to one another. If you have heard 5 different types, you have already heard most of them. This is especially true for modern Western music.

[B]Indian:[/B]

Melody in Indian music is the most important part of the music. In the standard Indian scale of 22 microtones hundreds if not thousands of individual melodies are possible, making each piece sound unique. These possible melodies are known as ragas or a sequence or subset of notes. A very basic raga is ascending and descending the seven notes: sa re ga ma pa da ne sa, sa ne da pa ma ga re sa.

For example, if you heard the song ‘Vande maataram, Shujalaam shuphalaam…’ you can tell that it has its own identity, which is different from the way ‘Jana gana mana…’ or ‘Roop tera mastana …’ sound. This song is in fact, based on a Ragam called ‘Desh’.
How do we forge such special musical identities using a keyboard ? The answer lies in choosing just a SUBSET of keys out of the twelve keys available in an octave (instead of all twelve) and sticking to just this subset of keys while making music. If you used all the keys in the keyboard to compose one song, you may not create anything with an identity. (You will see, as you understand more about music that this statement is strictly not true. There are nice-sounding musical compositions where almost all the keys are used)
Is there a lower limit on how FEW keys we can choose in our subset and still get by ? If we chose a subset of just three keys (say, the first three white keys) in an octave and limit ourselves to those keys, we see that we don’t have much variety to the melodies we can produce. It may sound like a drum beating. But is devoid of any special melodic personality. In general, (note that this is not an absolute law) one chooses five or six or seven keys out of the twelve keys available in an octave. More about these selection rules later. Once these keys are selected, the corresponding keys in the other octaves are also automatically selected and used in melody making.
In the context of Indian music, one has an extra degree of freedom. One can choose one set of keys to go up in frequency in the octave and choose an entirely different set to come down the octave, if we so desire. The key sequence to go up is called ‘Arohanam’ and the key sequence which forms the descending order is called the ‘Avarohanam’. More about it later as well ! Let us now stick to ‘symmetric’ choices while going up or down. At the risk of sounding repetitive, let me say that you can always decide to be a non-conformist and follow none of these so-called rules and conventions. Music is after all, a creative art and the final criterion is whether it sounds pleasing.

http://openscroll.org/ramesh/gentle2.html

Some popular ragas:

All Raagas have a starting phase which lasts for 1-2 min which are slow and meditative, and then it speeds up. This is proper and real music. If you have never heard Indian raaga music before, you are in for a surprise. Remember to make an effort to appreciate it.

Raaga Anandi Kalyan

Raaga Yaman

Raaga(does not specify)

Raag Desh

Raaga Shri

Songs based on Raagas:

Each raaga is classified according to the mood it elicits thus some raagas are considered ideal to be played at different times of the day(morning, night, evening) or different reasons.

[B][U]In conclusion [/U][/B]

Indian classical music and Western classical music are not just different, but Indian classical music is a more refined, developed and definitely more superior musical system. Its scope is more more noble and spiritual, meditative and about composing music in the situation to express the mood, whereas Western music is just the opposite loud and dramatic and all rehearsed and orchestrated.

It has far greater range and expression due its use of microtones, and in practice even the 22 microtones are not enough, and even greater subtle nunances are produced. This allows for smooth and effortless gliding up and down the scale, whereas in the Western scale it is jumpy. Many of the feats done by Indian vocalists are impossible to do in its Western counterpart.

The production of sound is more pure and hence why Indian classical music does not allow for Western type harmony with chords and orchestra which end up diluting the purity of the sound and producing a cacophony of noise. Rather in the Indian system other instruments act as supporting players and play along to the main melody.

The strongest point about Indian system is its huge emphasis on producing beautiful melodies with its unique raaga system, each raaga has its own personality. This is completely absent in Western classical music, where all music sounds samey.

Correction: or different seasons

Great post about music, it’s a very interesting topic.

Thanks.

Here is another comparison between Western singing and Indian singing, I am picking those artists who are considered exceptional today:

Western: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPjbkuD08J0&feature=related
Indian: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5QRTZN4Qh4

The Western girl is actually really good, and this is why she went onto win that years America’s got talent. However, note that most of her song consists of either modulation, RnB tricks with her voice and increasing the volume for dramatic effect. This is very characteristic of Western singing and it is usually to make up for what otherwise would sound very flat on the Western scale. In the West this is regarded as exceptional singing. Notice how the Indian artist(Shreya Ghosal) has such a great command of the song, effortlessly glides up and down the scale and not once loses any control, modulates her voice or has to increase her volume. She pulls it off effortlessly, whereas I am more than sure if you had given this song to a Western artist they would have struggled. The same is not true for an Indian artist, because if you can deal with a 22 microtone scale, a 12 semitone scale is a walk in the park.

Some more examples of Indian songs, but these are only lighly based on classical, I just love them because I am a sucker for melodies and deep songs and I’ve tried singing these myself:




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTUZXITdS9A&feature=related (beautiful, beautiful, especially if you understand the lyrics!!!)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlYsDMxotrM&feature=related (I have tried singing this multiple times, I cannot of course do the same justice to it as Jagjit Singh does!)

I think you would have to be musically dead to not appreciate the above :stuck_out_tongue:

“I do think one culture is more superior than another culture and one religion is superior to another.”

Are not the things that you consider “inferior” or “superior”, just your own relative ideas and concepts about the matter ? Depending on your own likes and dislikes, identifications, and prejudices, you will have different ideas as to what is “inferior” and “superior”. For the Christians - anybody who is not a Christian is to be condemned to hell. For the Muslim - anybody who is not a muslim is to be killed upon first sight. For the conservative Jain, unless you are born as a man - it is impossible to come to one’s enlightenment. If you are a woman, then you will have to be reborn in a male body. For Alexander the Great, the Greek culture was superior to all others, and that is why it has the right to rule over the whole world. For Adolf Hitler, the Aryan race was the superior race, and hence has the right to become the master race. For those who are clinging to democracy, certainly they think their political system is superior to all other systems. For somebody who is clinging to conservativism, certainly they too think that their system is better than everybody else’s. It is a natural tendency for one’s ego to want to affirm itself, to feel superior to others- that is it’s whole trip. It will find inexhaustible ways to express itself, both gross and subtle. That is what creates the desire for being competitive, because unless one sets another as “inferior” to oneself, then you cannot become intoxicated with the sense of being superior.

Are not the things that you consider “inferior” or “superior”, just your own relative ideas and concepts about the matter ?

No.

Existence itself does not discriminate between sages and fools, weeds or flowers, jewels or dung - and yet one continues setting things against one another as though they were contradictories.

And yet - one the other hand, one declares that everything arises out of one and the same divine nature. If everything is of one and the same divine nature, then where does the question of something being inferior or superior arise ? These are just the opinions of man and nothing more. A rotten apple is not an inferior apple, neither is a healthy tree a superior tree. It is simply that there are various different states of being, some which you find favorable and unfavorable, but all of which are none other than the same fundamental energy.

Existence itself does not discriminate between sages and fools, weeds or flowers, jewels or dung - and yet one continues setting things against one another as though they were contradictories.

It does in fact; it gives the sage wisdom, the fool stupidity, the weeds impotence, the flowers fragrance, jewels their lustre and dung its uglyness.

Each of you, is partially correct.

Discrimination amongst that which leads to pleasure or pain is perceived, as necessary, in order to ensure survival of the individual. Until the individual no longer functions as separate, it is not entirely relevant to state that nature’s indifference is identical to one’s own.

Nor is it particularly relevant to state that nature intends to discriminate, simply because such perception exists as a temporary means for the individual.

[QUOTE=TeeA;59062]I wish these clothes were more stylish here in the States! I love Indian clothes for women. They are so beautiful. Thanks for the link Nietzsche.[/QUOTE]

Well, that was merely an article. Here is a better link. Its just a Google Image search for Indian clothing.

“It does in fact; it gives the sage wisdom, the fool stupidity, the weeds impotence, the flowers fragrance, jewels their lustre and dung its uglyness.”

These are all simply various different qualities, none being better or worse than the other. Nature does not have even a single ripple of the idea of something being better or worse than another. Like the Sun, it emanates it’s light to all things in it’s path, nourishing both weeds and flowers, the sage and the fool, but does not care in particular for them. This is not nature’s discrimination - it does not have an intellect to discriminate. This is simply the fact that nature gives each of it’s expression an absolutely unique expression. In the whole existence, one is not going to find even a single flower which is the same. In the whole existence, the river current is never going to repeat itself. Every moment is absolutely unique and fresh. This is not the discrimination of nature, this is just the fact that, as one Greek has said, you cannot step into the same river twice.

These are all simply various different qualities, none being better or worse than the other.

I disagree I think wisdom is better than stupidity; fragance better than stench; lustre better than dullness.

And so do you because you may keep plants in your living room, but you certainly won’t keep dung there :wink:

Ultimately everything is pure and good. What seems impure is just different grades of purity. Lower grades we call impure, higher grades we call pure.

Each opinion, restated.

It appears that the river current is attempting to repeat itself.

May the more forceful of the two personailities, succeed.

[QUOTE=ray_killeen;58971]Surya Deva , is pushing beliefs an effective means to help the dire straits of the times, again, exposure and quality education may prove a sensible and effective option. My common folk perspective throughout recent decades detects exponential progression in the level of consciousness in the US, although politically it lags, history can never be changed, realistically a hybrid of worldly legacy may need to evolve to reach what you desire.

For every action there is an opposite and equal reaction, push and you will feel resistance.[/QUOTE]

It is impossible to have a hybrid of opposites like hot and cold or light and dark - likewise Dharmic and Western.

Dharma is not a belief. It is the natural order of something. Is it a belief the natural order of a teacher is to teach?

To foster a potential hybrid in the mind, is to attempt to remain aware of each opposing polarity simultaneously. This is an impossibility.

It is possible, however to remain aware that each perceived opposite is relative, and therefore limited.

[QUOTE=Surya Deva;59339]It is impossible to have a hybrid of opposites like hot and cold or light and dark - likewise Dharmic and Western.

Dharma is not a belief. It is the natural order of something. Is it a belief the natural order of a teacher is to teach?[/QUOTE]

Nothing to do with west, east, north or south, quality education would offer tools and methods in a system to help oneself clarify perception, realize insight and awaken to reality. Subjective education creates illusions fueled by rules, regulations, laws and religions in an attempt to control not liberate.

[QUOTE=JenniLeigh;59356]To foster a potential hybrid in the mind, is to attempt to remain aware of each opposing polarity simultaneously. This is an impossibility.

It is possible, however to remain aware that each perceived opposite is relative, and therefore limited.[/QUOTE]

In any kind of relativity theory there is always an absolute that is constant for all. In Einstein’s theory of relativity the constant is the speed of light. In Jain theory of relativity the constant is logic.

In terms of culture dharma is constant.

[QUOTE=ray_killeen;59363]Nothing to do with west, east, north or south, quality education would offer tools and methods in a system to help oneself clarify perception, realize insight and awaken to reality. Subjective education creates illusions fueled by rules, regulations, laws and religions in an attempt to control not liberate.[/QUOTE]

You do realise that what a culture considers “quality education” differs from culture to culure. In islamic culture for example education is considered study of the scriptures and Islamic history. It is highly controlled and dicatated affair and there is no room for dissent. In tribal cultures education is considered the direct involvement with nature and learning rituals. It is a highly dangerous form of education where mistakes can cost you your life - like eating the wrong plant, getting eaten by animals. In Western secular culture education is considered the study of material sciences. It is done through developing theories and discussing and debating them. In Indian culture education is considered to be the study of ending suffering, this encompasses studying the Vedic sciences like Yoga, Vedanta, Ayurveda, Sanskrit.

So west, earth, north and south obviously has a lot to do with it. If you were born in a pre-globalization age before Western culture infilitrated everywhere on the planet, you would have got a very different education depending on where you were born.

[U]Dharmic education:[/U]

As I said earlier in a dharmic society everything is based on natural order and natural order produces virtue. The dharmic society uses a Vedic approach and asks first what is the dharma of something, and based on that answer development begins:

What is the dharma of education? To anwer this question go back to caveman days when man had no education. Because he did not have education he did not have any language, hence he could not think properly. He could not count. He lived like an animal purely on the instinct level. Over time, man started to notice regularities: the regularity of seasons, the waxing and waning of the moon, the rubbing of flintstones produces fire etc He then realised he could improve his life by making use of these regularities. This became a body knowledge that when to transmitted from one generation to the other.

So the dharma of education is to learn about the nature of reality and improve ones quality of life. Learning about the nature of reality is therefore the modus operandi of education and not to learn about scripture, history, materials or ritual. In Hinduism we call this knowledge [B]paravidya [/B] - higher knowledge. As soon as you ask yourself about the nature of reality you are forced to ask what is reality and how reality takes place.

What is reality? Reality is observer + field of observation. Thereore education should give you knowledge of both the observer and field of observation. In Hinduism we call this kshetrya-jnana and kshetra - the knower of the field and the field. You cannot know just one, and not the other. You must know both, because reality is a function of both.

There an education system should give you both kinds of knowledge. The reason that the Western education system is such a failure is that its focuses almost exclusively on the world out there and pays scant attention to the inner world - the more intimate and important of the two. Simple questions like what is the cause of suffering, what causes vice, what causes virtue, what is the relationship between the mind and body are near absent.

What you do not realise the inner world can be examined with as much scientific scrutiny as the outer world - because the observer is common to both. I can view the internal world of mind as clearly as I can view the external world. I can discover its laws, just as I can discover the laws of the physical world. When I discover its laws I put them into use to better the quality of my life - to not suffer, to not have vice, to be full of virtue.

As I said earlier every dharmic cultural form is of superior quality. Like everything in our culture education is is also highly detailed, refined and textured. Our philosophy is superior; our sciences are superior; our religions are superior; our arts(music, dance) are superior. And our education system is also superior. If this world became dharmic overnight you would witness a glorious golden age dawn.

Surya Deva

A quality educational system that presents all worldly knowledge, accurately and non-subjectively for the individual to make an informed choice is most excellent.

All worldy knowledge, and no inner knowledge? What is the purpose of knowing the composition of a uranium atom if all you are going to do with it is kill hundreds of thousands to millions of your own people?

Have you purposefully blinded yourself to the flaws in your culture? Your education system produces people with a lot of knowledge about the world, but mentally retarded when it comes to the inner world. Why is that inner world important you ask? Because all intention, thought and action originates from there. If you haven’t got it right at the inner world level how do you have any hope of making the outer world right?